Issue Nr. 1
Mar. 19th 2000.
Contents:
I have started a very promising collaboration with Thomas
Schmidt of Exergia
(http://www.exergia.de/,
currently in
german only). Thomas has written an extension for Radiance,
which allows to integrate most daylight redirection systems
into a simulation. As a first step, the 2D forward raytracer
Osim computes the exact behaviour of the elements for every
incident angle of light. This data is then used by the
preprocessor Mktis, which can be used in a way similar to
mkillum, but takes precise account of solar as well as
diffuse irradiance.
I have adapted Rayfront to use Mktis, so that the user can
select one of the redirection elements in the library and
"apply" it to a window. The simulation will then take all
the necessary steps to run the program with the right data.
This feature will be available as a plug-in module to
Rayfront, at a yet undetermined price. To the best of my
knowledge, this will make Rayfront the only software package
available on the global market that offers such a general
possibility to compute the effects of daylight redirection
systems.
The simulations can include all translation-invariant
structures (aka. extrusion profiles) with mirrored or
refracting internal surfaces. The most obvious examples are
all kinds of mirrored surface louver systems, within
glazings or open. The other class of elements includes prism
panels, lasercut panels and curved acrylic strips that are
stapled within insulation glazings and are currently
becoming more and more popular in europe.
End of january we could demostrate Rayfront and Osim/Mktis
at the "6th Otti Symposion on Innovative Lighting Technology
in Buildings", a yearly convention that brings together most
innovative lighting specialists from the german speaking
contries and beyond. We were able to talk with many
important personalities from the industry and were generally
met with positive interest. The contacts we could initiate
there will make it much easier to collect the data needed
for bundling as many daylight systems as possible for your
simulations.
All in all, those two days reassured me a lot that there is
a real demand for a tool like Rayfront. It was interesting
to see that almost one out of three posters in the poster
exhibition had some kind of Radiance simulation on display.
This demonstrates that, at least in the research community,
Radiance is an established tool, even if not all users are
happy with its useability. Many people approached me with
descriptions of the troubles they had to fight in their
projects, asking if Rayfront would make their job easier. In
the majority of the cases I was very happy to confirm that!
As a byproduct of the demonstration above and an article I'm
just publishing about daylighting in banks, I ended up with a
number of diagrams depicting many of the currently available
daylighting systems. I have made the full collection
available
with short explanations.
This display will be enhanced with more
details about the actual products as soon as I have
collected more information from each manufacturer. Some
brand new systems are not mentioned yet, but I'll add them
soon. And of course, if you know of anything that I might
have missed, please tell me and if it can be simulated with
Radiance, I'll include it in this presentation.
As an interesting side note: My perspective may be biased
here, but I have yet to see an industrially manufactured
daylighting system for the vertical facade that was
developed outside europe, or even outside of germany,
austria or switzerland. Is there really such an enormous
lack of ingeniosity elsewhere, have I been blind to things
happening in the rest of the world, or what is going on
here? Yes, I know about solatube and similar systems, but
usually those only handle sunlight. In contrast to that,
most industrialized countries are located in moderate
climatic zones, where diffuse daylight from the sky or cloud
cover should be much more important. I'd be highly
interested in what people in other places know about this!
The Rayfront developement currently revolves around the
following topics:
Job scheduling
The mechanics for scheduling simulation
jobs for sequential execution are in place. I'll invent
a good user interface for actually using this very soon.
The general model for scheduling jobs is pretty simple
and convenient, wich will be good enough for most cases.
For more complex environments, there is a good chance that
I'll be able to offer another extension module for
Rayfront, which solves every conveivable job distribution
problem. More details about this later, when/if the
license negotiations show first results.
Autocad integration
First experiments at embedding
Rayfront as an ARX application within Autocad have been a
success. Spinning off from this work, I'll make a Python
wrapper of the ADS API available as an open source
project. If none of those acroyms means anything to you,
don't worry. Only a certain strange kind programmers needs
to waste their mental energy on this.
Luminaire selection
A better user interface for luminaire
data import and selection is needed soon. More about that
hopefully in the next issue of this newsletter.
Speaking of luminaire data:
I am considering to offer a luminaire data format conversion
service on www.schorsch.com. Since I already have the code
to read IES, Eulumdat and CIBSE TM14 format data, the
additional effort to also write those formats shouldn't be
too daunting. Creating a useful web interface to this
functionality will be harder, so it may as well take a few
weeks until I find the time to implement this. While all the
formats involved are fairly simple, they are sufficiently
different to make this a nontrivial task. The service will
have to offer lots of configuration options to become really
useful.
Issue 08 (2002 Sep. 9.)
Issue 07 (2002 Apr. 29.)
Issue 06 (2001 Jul. 10.)
Issue 05 (2001 Feb. 20.)
Issue 04 (2000 Dec. 5.)
Issue 03 (2000 Aug. 31.)
Issue 02 (2000 May 15.)
Issue 01 (2000 Mar. 19.)
|